Psalm 5 verse 5 – “God Hates Sinners”
Psalm 5 verse 5 – “God hates sinners”
As an introduction, I would like to make a statement which at first glance may seem to be extremely offensive to some. However, no one will be able to prove me wrong when it is put to the test under the white-hot scrutiny of the Word of God. The statement is this:-
The Virgin Mary was as much a lost sinner as Cain and Esau despite the fact that she was not a bloodthirsty and devious murderer.
Was Paul who wrote Romans 3:23 under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit hallucinating when He said “All have sinned and come short of the glory of God?”
As you may have seen and heard from many video clips on YouTube and from many articles written by Calvinists, adherents to the Doctrines of Grace (Reformed Theology ensconced in TULIP) brazenly and unashamedly assert that God hates sinners. It is indeed a brave and brash statement when taken into account that the Virgin Mary was as much a lost sinner as Cain and Esau.
It follows that God hated the Virgin Mary as much as He hated Cain and Esau, according to Calvinists like Paul Washer, David Platt, Robert Morey, and John Piper. I only need to quote three passages from Scripture to prove that the Virgin Mary was as much a lost sinner as Cain and Esau.
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God. (Romans 3:23). For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all. (Romans 11:32) And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. (Luke 1:47)
God cannot have mercy on you unless you are a lost sinner and realize and acknowledge that you are a lost sinner. Most people acknowledge that they are sinners but very little admit that they are lost sinners on their way to hell. A Calvinist once wrote:
The bible never says that God’s people [the elect] were ever bound for hell, it says they were chosen “in Christ” before the foundation of the world (Eph 1:4). The conviction of sin is usually misinterpreted by God’s people to be the conviction that they are hell bound, the gospel explains to them that they are not, because of what Christ did FOR them.
So, in essence, the Gospel is only meant for and on behalf of the so-called elect as a kind of surety that they were never lost and hell-bound. What utter nonsense. These so-called people of God are lost and need to hear and obey the true Gospel message.
If God chose the elect unto salvation BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, He must have loved them BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, which means that He never hated them. God could not possibly have chosen them unto salvation if He hated them BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.
That’s ridiculous, to say the least. Nonetheless, Calvinists maintain that God hates sinners. The sinners to whom they refer cannot be the elect because God chose and loved them before the foundation of the world. The only remaining sinners are the non-elect and therefore they must be the sinners whom God hates. Is this not the reason why Calvinists are taught to hate non-Calvinists? (Read here).
Let us now turn to Psalm 5:5, one of the Calvinist’s most quoted verses to validate their view that God hates sinners. Note carefully, the verse does not say God hates sinners. It says that God hates all workers of iniquity. The word for “workers” is “פָּעַל” (pâ‛al) and portrays sinners who persistently, habitually, and relentlessly, non-repentantly practice iniquity and fondly boast about it.
Hence the words the foolish (literally, boasters) shall not stand in thy sight” (will not be allowed to approach Him and stand in his presence). Verse 6 reveals what kind of iniquity David had in mind. “Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing (falsely and deceitfully): the LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.”
God will destroy (in hell) all the bloody (murderous) and devious men who deceitfully and cunningly justify their heinous and bloodthirsty way of life and non-repentantly pursue such a lifestyle to the very end of their lives.
I deliberately used the words “persistently,” “non-repentantly,” and “practice” to affirm that any bloodthirsty and deceitful person who remains adamant to repent and turn to God for forgiveness will remain an object of God’s abhorrence. You may argue that this does not apply to you because you are not a bloodthirsty person. You are kind, good, compassionate, loving, helpful, a giver instead of a receiver, and so forth. Bully for you. Nevertheless, if you remain unrepentant and persistently refuse to respond to God’s Gospel call for Him to save you, you will remain a Psalm 5:5 recipient of God’s righteous hatred. But, remember this, God’s hatred is not the kind Calvinists attribute to Him in their so-called Doctrines of Grace that says He has chosen some for eternal damnation before the foundation of the world.
To illustrate we must briefly review one of the most tragic events in the author of Psalm 5, King David’s life. In a nutshell, this incident in King David’s life transpired as follows.
He saw a naked married woman bathing; he lusted after her; he had her brought to him; he had sex with her; she fell pregnant; he started to panic; he cunningly began to devise devious plans to have her husband think that he was the father; when all his devious plans failed he had her husband killed in the heat of a battle.
He must have thought that his devious plan to place the man in the front line of the battlefield and have his men withdraw so that the man stood alone against the enemy was not murder but a brilliant battle strategy to rid him of his worst enemy (his conscience).
King David’s actions fit every category of a bloody and deceitful man in Psalm 5 which made him a perfect object for God’s hatred and abhorrence. Did God hate and abhor him? Here’s what the Bible has to say about King David.
And when he had removed him (King Saul), he raised up unto them David to be their king; to whom also he gave testimony, and said, I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after mine own heart, (1 Samuel 13:14) which shall fulfil all my will. Of this man's seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Saviour, Jesus: (Acts 13:22-23)
The first thing that springs to mind is God’s unfailing resilience to choose David to be king of Israel and Judah despite the fact that He knew before the foundation of the world that his favorite Psalmist, who made it known that He abhors all workers of iniquity, was himself a bloody and deceitful man on one occasion.
If God wanted to be consistent in his judgments then He must have hated and abhorred King David as much as He hated and abhorred every bloody and deceitful man and all workers of iniquity. What is the difference between all the workers of iniquity, every bloody and deceitful man, and King David? Nothing, except Psalm 51.
To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David, when Nathan the prophet came unto him, after he had gone in to Bathsheba. Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions. Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin. For I acknowledge my transgressions: and my sin is ever before me. Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest. (Psalm 51:1-4)
It could have been nothing else than David’s humility to acknowledge and confess his sins to God and wholeheartedly repent of them that made him the man after God’s own heart.
Consequently, it was something he himself had done that rendered him a man after God’s own heart.
It follows that God does not hate the bloody and deceitful men for what they are (aka God hates sinners) but for that which they refuse to do, i.e. to humble themselves under the mighty hand of God, repent and ask for His forgiveness, like King David.
From the above, it is easy to deduce – if you are a Calvinist – that God hated King David and his most important descendant, the Virgin Mary.
Why do Calvinists defend their abhorrent doctrine that “God hates sinners?”
The reason for them having to uphold this doctrine at all costs stems from their warped soteriology. John MacArthur sums it up perfectly on his site Grace To You when he writes:
(The following Question and Answers were taken from John MacArthur’s book, The God Who Loves, pp. 14, 16. ©2001 by John MacArthur. All Rights Reserved.)
Does God love the elect and hate the non-elect?
Selected Scriptures QA184
Question:
There are some who teach that God loves only His elect and hates the non-elect. Please comment.John:
The fact that some sinners are not elected to salvation is no proof that God’s attitude toward them is utterly devoid of sincere love. We know from Scripture that God is compassionate, kind, generous, and good even to the most stubborn sinners.Who can deny that these mercies flow out of God’s boundless love? Yet it is evident that they are showered even on unrepentant sinners.
I want to acknowledge, however, that explaining God’s love toward the reprobate is not as simple as most modern evangelicals want to make it. Clearly there is a sense in which the psalmist’s expression, “I hate the assembly of evildoers” (Ps. 26:5) is a reflection of the mind of God.
“Do I not hate those who hate Thee, O Lord? And do I not loathe those who rise up against Thee? I hate them with the utmost hatred; they have become my enemies” (Ps. 139:21-22). Such hatred as the psalmist expressed is a virtue, and we have every reason to conclude that it is a hatred God Himself shares.
After all, He did say, “I have hated Esau” (Mal. 1:3; Rom. 9:13). The context reveals God was speaking of a whole race of wicked people. So there is a true and real sense in which Scripture teaches that God hates the wicked.
So an important distinction must be made. God loves believers with a particular love. It is a family love, the ultimate love of an eternal Father for His children. It is the consummate love of a Bridegroom for His bride. It is an eternal love that guarantees their salvation from sin and its ghastly penalty.
That special love is reserved for believers alone.
However, limiting this saving, everlasting love to His chosen ones does not render God’s compassion, mercy, goodness, and love for the rest of mankind insincere or meaningless.
When God invites sinners to repent and receive forgiveness (Isa. 1:18; Matt. 11:28-30), His pleading is from a sincere heart of genuine love. “‘As I live!’ declares the Lord God, ‘I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that the wicked turn from his way and live. Turn back, turn back from your evil ways! Why then will you die, O house of Israel?'” (Ezek. 33:11).
Clearly God does love even those who spurn His tender mercy, but it is a different quality of love, and different in degree from His love for His own.
John MacArthur tries his level best to prove, through his usual maze of inconsistencies, that God loves all people – elect and non-elect alike – but not in the same way, as if He’s saying “Here’s one kind of love for you and another kind of love for you. But don’t fret, I am dead sincere in both my kinds of love.”
What MacArthur actually says, is that God is double-hearted or double-minded. Why would God want to be double-hearted or double-minded when He disavows a man who is double-minded and thus unstable in all his ways (James 1:8). How does God’s double-mindedness work in Calvinism? It works like this. God says:
Please don’t misunderstand me when I say I love both the elect and the non-elect, but not in the same way. Even though I have decided by decree to send you (the non-elect) to hell before the foundation of the world, I still have a very sincere and meaningful love for you.
The next time when the beautiful rays of My sun shine on your brow and raindrops fall on your head, remember that it is a sign of my great love for you.
Pardon Me, What was that you said? ‘Solomon wrote in his book Ecclesiastes under the inspiration of My Holy Spirit that everything on earth is meaningless or vanity?” Uhmmm, Don’t listen to him. He thought he was the wisest man who ever lived. He was not, I tell you. John MacArthur, Senior Pastor of the Grace Community Church in California, America is the wisest man in the world.
At least he sincerely and meaningfully presents Me properly to the world when he says: ‘However, limiting this saving, everlasting love to His chosen ones, does not render God’s compassion, mercy, goodness, and love for the rest of mankind insincere or meaningless.’
He’s right, you know. I am dead serious and sincere when I say I love you and equally dead serious and sincere when I say I am going to send you to hell because I have not chosen you to be part of my Bride. I am sincere in doing this because it gives Me great pleasure. Therefore, I am sending you to hell with bags full of love in my heart for you.
Pardon Me, did you say something again? Did I hear you correctly? Does John MacArthur say I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked? (Ezekiel 33:11).
That’s true, but my dearly beloved and elected John MacArthur also said it gives me more glory (read here) to send the non-elect whom I love so much to hell. Therefore it pleases me to send you (the non-elect) to hell because it glorifies me magnanimously more.
Please don’t tell my beloved and elected John I spotted this teeny-weeny inconsistency in his rendition of me having no pleasure in sending you (the non-elect) to hell. It may hurt his feelings and make him feel unloved by me.
So, as you can see, in my temporal blessings of the non-elect I prove that I sincerely and meaningfully love the non-elect but in my eternal blessings that I sincerely and meaningfully hate them. That’s why another one of my sincerely beloved and elected blue-eyed boys can say that I simultaneously love and hate sinners.
God simultaneously loves and hates sinners
In defense of his interpretation of Psalm 5:5 Platt says that it is a quote from the Bible. Well,now, that doesn’t say much, does it?
Calvinists quote many other verses from Scripture such as John 3:16 but heinously and deliberately misinterpret them. Even the devil quoted some verses from Scripture to Jesus Christ. Says who? “If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands, they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.” (from Psalm 91).
How else is Satan going to transform himself into an angel of light and his ministers into ministers of righteousness if they do not quote the Bible? (2 Corinthians 11:14-15).
Come on Platty, I dare you to quote the devil because he also quoted from the Bible.
If God is double-minded and therefore unstable in all his ways, who can trust Him? In fact, MacArthur is accusing God of being unstable, disorderly, disturbed, and confused. That’s what the word “akatastatos” in James 1:8 actually means. No wonder Dave Hunt said Calvinism is a misrepresentation of God. Anyone who fosters a view of God other than the one portrayed in the Bible is an idolater.
Let us now briefly look at the verses John MacArthur quoted to substantiate his and his Calvinist brethren’s insipid belief that God hates/loves sinners (Some say God hates sinners; others say God hates/loves sinners and yet others, like John MacArthur, say God loves the non-elect but not in the same way that He loves the elect).
To understand the real meaning of the verses John MacArthur quoted, we need to turn to the New Testament. Jesus commanded his followers to love their enemies (Matthew 5:44) but in the same breath warns them not to associate or fellowship with them (2 Corinthians 6:14-18). And there you have it – love your enemies for the sake of Christ and their salvation but hate the things they do. (Psalm 1).
Psalm 26:5.
John MacArthur and David Platt, hailed as illustrious Pastors in their own congregations should know Psalm 26:5 does not say God hates sinners per se. It clearly says King David hated the congregation of evildoers and refused to fellowship with them. The previous verse makes this abundantly clear:. “I do not sit with men of falsehood, nor do I consort with hypocrites.” (Verse 4 ESV).
It echoes to perfection the New Testament principle that saints ought to love their enemies but never fellowship with them – never to “sit with men of falsehood, not to consort with hypocrites.”
Wasn’t that one of Jesus Christ’s habits when He was still on earth – to sit and eat with sinners (Matthew 9:10-12) and the Pharisees (the archaic and original elected Calvinists of Jesus’ day) hated Him for it? He sat with sinners but never took part or consorted with them in their evil doings. He sat with them because He loved them – not to condone their evil doings but to preach to them the Gospel.
Bible scholars agree that King David was a type of Jesus Christ as King, just as Joseph was a type of Him as the suffering Servant. As God’s anointed both Jesus and King David suffered many things at the hands of their own brethren (and even their closest of kin) without them having any reason to hate them. Psalm 59, for instance, is a key element to a correct understanding of the hatred King David felt for his enemies.
To the chief Musician, Altaschith, Michtam of David; when Saul sent, and they watched the house to kill him. Deliver me from mine enemies, O my God: defend me from them that rise up against me. Deliver me from the workers of iniquity, and save me from bloody men (here again, as in Psalm 5, the workers of iniquity were bloody men who relentlessly pursued and plotted to kill King David in the very same way the Pharisees plotted and pursued Jesus to kill Him. For, lo, they lie in wait for my soul: the mighty are gathered against me; not for my transgression, nor for my sin, O LORD. (Psalm 59:1-3).
David did not hate them because they were sinners. If that were true God would have hated King David as well (1 Samuel 13:14) because he too sinned and stained his hands with the blood of an innocent man. In fact, this was the main reason why he wasn’t permitted to build the temple – his hands were blood-stained (1 Chronicles 28:3).
He hated their congregation, their schemes, and their plots and not them personally. If King David hated King Saul who was the mastermind behind these plots, he would not have spared his life on those occasions when he had the opportunity to kill him.
And it came to pass, when Saul was returned from following the Philistines, that it was told him, saying, Behold, David is in the wilderness of Engedi. Then Saul took three thousand chosen men out of all Israel, and went to seek David and his men upon the rocks of the wild goats. And he came to the sheepcotes by the way, where was a cave; and Saul went in to cover his feet: and David and his men remained in the sides of the cave. And the men of David said unto him, Behold the day of which the LORD said unto thee, Behold, I will deliver thine enemy into thine hand, that thou mayest do to him as it shall seem good unto thee. Then David arose, and cut off the skirt of Saul's robe privily. And it came to pass afterward, that David's heart smote him, because he had cut off Saul's skirt. And he said unto his men, The LORD forbid that I should do this thing unto my master, the LORD'S anointed, to stretch forth mine hand against him, seeing he is the anointed of the LORD. So David stayed his servants with these words, and suffered them not to rise against Saul. But Saul rose up out of the cave, and went on his way. (1 Samuel 24:1-7; Acts 13:22,23).
David’s own son, Absalom, was one of his worst enemies and like King Saul, he plotted to kill him and usurp his throne.
Yet David "commanded Joab and Abishai and Ittai, saying, Deal gently for my sake with the young man, even with Absalom." when they fought against Absalom's army (2 Samuel 18:5).
Anyone, including John MacArthur and David Platt, who interprets David’s lenient behavior toward King Saul and Absolom as hatred, must have their minds sorted out. It proves beyond any doubt that King David did not hate them but their evil ways.
Psalm 139:21,22
Here again “hatred” must be understood as David’s abhorrence of their conduct and his refusal to fellowship with them and that he had no desire to be associated with them.
The expression here – “grieved” – explains the meaning of the word “hate” in the first part of the verse. It is not that kind of hatred that is followed by malignity or ill-will; it is that which is accompanied by grief – the pain of heart – pity – sorrow. So the Saviour looked on people: Mark 3:5: “And when he had looked round about on them with “anger,” being “grieved” for the hardness of their hearts.”
The Hebrew word used here, however, contains also the idea of being disgusted with; of loathing; of nauseating.
A question we need to ask is, why did King David describe his hatred as perfect hatred? The emotion called hatred, as MacArthur and Platt see it, cannot have an opposite called “an imperfect hatred.”
What would anyone say when asked what an imperfect hatred means? Is it a mixture of love and hatred and if so what are the ingredients – 70% hatred and 30% love or vice versa?
There is no such thing as imperfect hatred. When Christ said “Love your enemies” He couldn’t possibly have meant that your love should be a mixture of love and hatred. In the same way, hatred cannot be a mixture of love and hatred. Both are absolutes and cannot be mixed.
It’s like water and oil. King David must have known God’s will that he should love his enemies. Is there any evidence that he knew of Christ’s command to love his enemies?
I have already mentioned his attitude to King Saul and his own son, Absalom, who hated his guts and pursued every opportunity to kill him. Therefore King David’s hatred could not have been the kind they leveled at him.
When he said “I hate them with a perfect hatred,” he, meant that he made no compromise with them and completely and fully abhorred their counsels, fellowship, and unholy plots.
God makes no bones about the seriousness of hatred, as MacArthur and Platt see is, so much so that He equates it with murder. “Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him” (1 John 3:15).
A good example is the hatred of John Calvin and his murder of Servetus and many others whose vile doctrines MacArthur, Platt, and many other Calvinists blindly follow.
1 John 3:15 proves that King David’s hatred could never have been the sort King Saul and his son, Absolom had for him.
It simply means that King David had no sympathy whatsoever for the things they were plotting against him; he did not apologize in the very least for their conduct and completely rejected it with an entire disapprobation.
His hatred was not the kind King Saul and Absalom had for him.
In this sense, King David’s love for his enemies together with his hatred of their conduct harmonize perfectly with Matthew 5:43,44 and 2 Corinthians 6:14.
What to tell your kids at night before you tuck them in: “I love you but God hates you”
David Platt has four kids of whom two are adopted. Having heard him quote the Bible (out of context) so boldly in public that God hates sinners, I was wondering whether he and his wife have ever told their kids with equal boldness that God hates them. “Daddy and mommy love you very much, but God hates you to bits.” Now, now, don’t be angry at me. I didn’t say it. Pastor David Platt, pastor-teacher at McLean Bible Church since 2017, says and believes it.
God Loves ALL humans, He hates sin – not the humans He created! – He clearly shows the we should also hate sin – kill the sin in your self and live a righteous,as seen by Him,life in the being of Jesus. Humans has been appointed by God Most High, as His representatives ( Gen 1:28) – We have all been blessed with the Holy Spirit – many do not listen to His voice and does not IMMEDIATELY do (act) on His voice – then he will go quite – if you persist in chasing your own death. He IS Lord of all. The destroyer is lying to you – and you believe him. Ephesians 6 states clearly that we are you take EVERY THOUGHT captive. – If we do, you are ruling as God intended over sin trying to cheat you out of Life eternal.
We are not living the fullness of Life in Jesus of Nazareth – as we listen to rubbish music and continually look at lies, TV being the most abundant source of lies. Presenting lies is called art – yes of lying.
Revelations states that we will worship the Most High continually 24 / 7 and 365 days a year – so why do we settle for anything less. We blame God for not DOING something about the sin in the world, whereas He has appointed you and I to take care of His vineyard, planet earth. Many are completely asleep and needs to be awakened and flesh needs to grow on the dead bones and Life from His breath needs to be blown into His crated persons.
We need to desire to be in His presence, He will reveal Himself to you. You need to desire the 7 Spirits before His throne to completely consume all sin in you and to purify you in His Holy fire. ( As with Daniel…) Desire to enter His courts with song and praise, in reverent fear (respect) of the Lord, through the Holy Spirit, to be GIVEN His knowledge, wisdom, understanding, through our Teacher, Jesus Christ of Nasareth, to wander this earth in righteousness – killing sin in the self-righteousness of yourself, such that we can truly represent Him with fruitful works in His power to the Glory of God our Father. We need to cover all doors of our souls with the Blood of His Lamb which has given His Life – such that we can also show those who has not yet found Him, the way as His Light in this world. We are His waiters at the wedding table of the Lamb, serving our fellow humans when they are in need – with what they need, both physical assistance, and with spiritual help – which come through and by the Holy one of Israel. Israel being those persons who has accepted the character of Jesus of Nasareth as their own. There are 12 doors to Jerusalem, with only one door – being the entry to the inner court of the Most High. Jesus declared – I AM the door -if you anter via any of the other doors – you will not attained what you desire as then you reject the Son of God – the Teacher and perfect example to truly Live and to be the Loved child of God Most High. Heed the voice of Him in you and do not grieve Him anymore. As to sin – He said – whats done is done – your sins are forgiven – AND SIN NO MORE. If you do not heed this you are opposing and grieving His Spirit.
Pieter
You said “Humans has been appointed by God Most High, as His representatives ( Gen 1:28) – We have all been blessed with the Holy Spirit….many do not listen to His voice and does not IMMEDIATELY do (act) on His voice – then he will go quite – if you persist in chasing your own death.”
Really? So what you are saying is that every human has the Holy Spirit in them but it’s when we don’t listen to Him, over time He goes away? Goodness, I’ve never heard this one before… Would you mind backing this up with scripture
You said “We need to cover all doors of our souls with the Blood of His Lamb which has given His Life”
So WE need to cover ‘all doors’ to our souls with the blood of Jesus. Hmmmmmm…. Ok No.1 There are no doors to our souls, 2nd we only have 1 soul, 3rd Jesus Christ does the sprinkling of your heart with His preacious blood, not you”
You said, “You need to desire the 7 Spirits before His throne to completely consume all sin in you and to purify you in His Holy fire”
7 spirits before the throne? Um… what about Jesus Christ? And you say these 7 spirits consume all sin in you, tell me after they have consumed all the sin in you do you sin again?
You said, “We are His waiters at the wedding table of the Lamb, serving our fellow humans when they are in need” Waiters at the wedding feats of the Bride? *shaking my head*… Seriously, you can be a waiter but I will be dining at the wedding feast for I am born again and form part of the Bride of Christ.
What doctrine do you follow and what church do you go too?
You said, “If you do not heed this you are opposing and grieving His Spirit.”
Has it ever crossed your mind that you are opposing Jesus Christ and grieving His spirit with all this nonsense you are speaking?
Dear Tom, I think that you might be misinterpreting the words spoken by John MacArthur. It is my opinion that he says exactly what you explained with regard to this topic. That in any case, is how I understood what he is saying. The same as what you are saying.
Kind regards,
KvdR
Dear KvdR
Do you understand the religion call Calvinism?
Hallo Deborah, thanks for the speed response. I am reading up on Calvinism and so far I understood that there is 5 different versions of Calvinism and that some of these preachers you mentioned do not adhere to the strict understanding of Calvinism.
Like I said – when I read what John MacArhur say in this regard and also when I read what you say – I get the same message. I did read through your one article about Calvinism and I fully understand the pitfalls and dangers of this doctrine. You would have to be very much full of yourself and a narcissist to believe the pure original Calvinistic doctrine.
Please can you comment on how I see this topic:
1. God loves all humans and therefore gives each individual equal opportunity to believe and repent and be saved. Because He knows all things, He knows who will choose Him and who not – but because He is fair and just and because of His long suffering love, He gives us ample time and opportunity. The world is also like a training ground, training us to be able to discern between good and evil, with the help of the Holy Spirit, because someday we will judge angels. It is also a testing ground, in which we are being made pure as gold.
2. I think when the Bible refers to the very elect, it is referring to those people who made a choice to serve God. Because they choose to serve God, they are His elect. How I understood the teaching is that God knows who will choose Him and this might be part and parcel of why He disciplines those He loves. But election is NOT BASED on God choosing us (His choice would always entail that ALL people be saved), He elected those that would love Him at the foundation of the earth but that doesn’t absolve human beings from the choice they have to make for or against God.
That is my understanding and it might therefore also be the reason I interpret your writing on this topic as the same as that of John MacArthur.
God elected those that would love Him at the foundation of the earth but that doesn’t absolve human beings from the choice they have to make for or against God. That is also why God definitely did make His offer of being saved available to all human beings – as He doesn’t have any pleasure in the death of the wicked. He created all humans, so like a perfect father He obviously loves all His children and His deepest desire would be that all be saved. But He also knows the reality- the way is narrow and those that pass through it is few. Love protects, so in a way it does hate those who are wicked/does wicked things. I think that love for those that are pure in heart, does mean that the wicked ones, who harm the pure in heart, is despised- but only as long as they don’t repent. Is that not what we see in the old Testament and again when Jesus returns and every person is judged?
This is a subject that I am still learning about so please don’t see this as an attack. I am just trying to learn and I am trying to not be deceived because I grew up in the AFM church and some of the false preachers you expose I have heard about or encountered myself. So things are still a bit of a maze to me.
Dear KvdR
Nope there are not 5 different versions of Calvinism. You are getting confused by thinking that the doctrine of TULIP (5 points of Calvinism) makes up 5 different types of Calvinists; thinking that if a person only believes in 4 points that makes him a 4 point Calvinist. There is one version of Calvinism and that is based on Predestination, that one is Elect by God before the foundation of the earth to go to heaven and the rest God dooms to hell because it pleases Him. And mankind has no free will to choose God, as they can’t do any good whatsoever, include muster up any faith in God, that is why the ‘Elect’ have to mongeristically be given the gift of faith by God first to believe…in Calvinism.
Each point in the so called ‘doctrines of grace’ (TULIP) is like a house of cards, one point relies on the other to be correct. You can’t say you are a 3 or 4 point Calvinist, there is no such thing. If you remove one doctrine (or Letter from TULIP) from the deck the whole thing crumbles.
You said “1. God loves all humans and therefore gives each individual equal opportunity to believe and repent and be saved. Because He knows all things, He knows who will choose Him and who not – but because He is fair and just and because of His long suffering love, He gives us ample time and opportunity. The world is also like a training ground, training us to be able to discern between good and evil, with the help of the Holy Spirit, because someday we will judge angels. It is also a testing ground, in which we are being made pure as gold.”
Calvinists do not believe this at all. Calvinists believe that God loves His chosen only (those that follow Calvinism) and He hates those whom he has not chosen.
You said “2. I think when the Bible refers to the very elect, it is referring to those people who made a choice to serve God. Because they choose to serve God, they are His elect. How I understood the teaching is that God knows who will choose Him and this might be part and parcel of why He disciplines those He loves. But election is NOT BASED on God choosing us (His choice would always entail that ALL people be saved), He elected those that would love Him at the foundation of the earth but that doesn’t absolve human beings from the choice they have to make for or against God.”
Everyone is predestined to be saved, but as you so wonderfully stated “Because they choose to serve God, they are His elect.”
John MacArthur believes nothing of the above.
Carry on studying KvdR, carry on seeking the truth… :nod:
This is going to sound a bit nitpicky: But you keep using the word “insipid” – literally “tasteless” – when “insidious” would be better suited. Calvinism has a very strong flavour: Bitter. It tells men “Don’t even bother trying to come to God even if he offers. Don’t bother trying to please him.” If you hear that there is an elect destined forever to go to heaven and a reprobate destined forever to Hell then always a sinful heart when made aware of itself will say “It is hopeless. I am already in Hell.” Where is the purification in that? Where is the salt? It is likely to ensnare you into greater sin in your hopelessness, rather than looking to Jesus. And it does this doubly because it also foments a pride in those that believe they are elect. Bitter indeed. And God resists the proud.
Merriam-Webster
Definition of insipid
1: lacking in qualities that interest, stimulate, or challenge: DULL, FLAT
insipid prose
2: lacking taste or savor: TASTELESS
insipid food
As you can see it has two applications. I used it in the sense of DULL and FLAT (unintelligent).
Ah, thank you for responding Tom. Again, I am sorry if I came off as arrogant, I was moved by a passion and I do not know if I was in the right to be. I can see how you might use it in that sense. By the by, I am still looking forward to your clarification on the matter of Baptism following my comment here: https://www.discerningtheworld.com/2020/12/09/lordship-salvation/
I think I get some idea from this article:
https://www.discerningtheworld.com/2018/08/29/hyper-dispensationalism/
But I’d still like to get the clarification you have in store there. Thank you in advance. 🙂
Be payient. I am working on it.
Hi Collin. For what it is worth, here is my response to your question on baptism. Please bear with me; it is a very lengthy answer.
OK, let’s begin with your statement, “The teaching I have been taught is that this is not done to confer the new birth or the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but as a signification of it after public profession of faith. I was not taught that I would receive any special ability of God, but that it was something you do when you believe.”
First off I would like to refer you to an article written by The Berean Call some years ago to illustrate why you were told to be baptized subsequent to salvation as a believer. The TBC Staff wrote:
You may have spotted the two things about water baptism that stand out like a sore thumb in the above paragraph. They are:
Both are true and yet it has caused havoc among many thousands of people throughout church history. If baptism by immersion in 30 to 60 thousand liters of water (the normal capacity of domestic swimming pools) or in the Jordan River in Israel, cannot save, and if it is not part of the Gospel, why are so many people taught that they should be baptized after their salvation? It’s like saying to someone, “OK, now that you are saved, you need to do something that has nothing to do with salvation or the Gospel. You must be baptized to show the world that you are obedient to God and that you are now a Christian, buried with him by baptism into [His] death . . . [and] raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father.” Anything void of any spiritual significance goes against or is contrary to the Gospel. Yet we are told that water baptism is “an act of obedience.” How can anything that cannot save and is not part of the Gospel (the Good News) be “an act of obedience?” Why would Christ, the essence of Truth, command anyone to do something when it has no Gospel import whatsoever?
As you may have noticed TBC refers to Romans 6:4 to substantiate water baptism. But, let us look at it more carefully. Paul says, “Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ [and not into water) were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (Romans 6:3-4). Paul is not talking about water baptism per se. His main focus is to remind them that sin has been dealt with in the most radical way possible. God was put to death on a cursed tree (for our redemption) and raised from the dead (for our sanctification), and sanctification, like salvation, is incumbent on faith, and faith alone. Nonetheless, some of the Christians in Rome began to believe that sin was not such a big issue because God’s grace always abounds in far greater degrees than our sins, “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound.” (Romans 5:20).
In other words, they used God’s much more abounding grace as an excuse for their sins. There seems to be a glimmer of shock in Paul’s question, as if he said, “What? What are you saying? Don’t you know that the day when you were saved by faith in the finished work of Christ on the cross, you were baptized with the Holy Spirit into Him and were henceforth fully covered (enmeshed, immersed) in everything He accomplished by his death, his resurrection, his ascension into heaven, his position at the right hand of God, and his imminent return for his own? Isn’t this what Paul meant when he wrote, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ”? (Ephesians 1:3). And yet, we are advised to go back to a sacrament in and with water that John the Baptist performed as a sign unto repentance and had absolutely nothing in common with the burial and resurrection of the saints together with Christ in Romans 6?
Oh, wait a bit, baptism in water (lots and lots of water) can only be administered by an ordained minister, pastor or priest. You never hear of lay Christians baptizing others who had been saved left, right, and center in their homes. They always do it in a church. At any rate, why is it necessary to be baptized in a church, supposedly as a witness that he/she is buried and resurrected with Christ when the church members should know that the redeemed sinner was already baptized into Christ Jesus (not in water) when he/she got saved? It’s like saying to the redeemed sinner, “Ok, we know and believe that you were saved, but now we want to see with our own eyes that you have been buried and raised with Christ to a new life. Show us the evidence.”
What does God say? “A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.” (Matthew 16:4). Most Christians who have been baptized in this way (in lots and lots of water) usually put their trust in the sign of their baptism (and almost always in tandem with the speaking in tongues) and not Jesus Christ. Some time ago I had a WhatsApp chat with one of my wife’s friends which eventually led me to ask her how she was saved. Even before she had responded to my question I told my wife, “I bet you she is going to say, “I was baptized with the Holy Ghost in water and spoke in tongues.” The words had scarcely left my lips when she answered back, “I was radically saved when I was completely immersed in water, and baptized with the Holy Ghost, and spoke in tongues for three solid days.” No mention of sin, of Jesus, of God’s gracious mercy, of forgiveness, of being lost eternally? Nothing?
In conclusion, it is imperative to explain that water baptism was intrinsically a rite performed by John the Baptist. His very name proves that water baptism was uniquely something he was called to perform among the Jews, mainly because the Jews continually sought signs (1 Corinthians 1: 22-24). Henceforth, his cry in the wilderness was not a cry unto water baptism, subsequent to salvation as a sign that they had been buried and raised from the dead with Christ. It was a cry unto repentance. In other words, he urged the Jews to stop thinking that their water cleansing baptism rites which they and their forefathers had been doing so long, had salvific properties, but that they needed to repent (change their mind for the better, the better being salvific faith in Jesus Christ). Therefore, John the Baptist’s water baptism was merely a token, a sign if you will, that those whom he baptized were willing and eager to change their minds about their need for salvation through their Messiah, Jesus Christ.
Do you see how they have changed the meaning of John the Baptist’s water baptism? John said to the Jews, “OK, so you want a sign. God has granted you something you have been doing all along in your religion (water cleansing rituals) without really understanding its true significance. (His cry was not for baptism, as they do today, but repentance). Listen up, it means nothing without repentance and faith toward God. Repent ye therefore, Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matthew 3:2). Nowadays they tell you, “Welcome! You are now in the Kingdom of God, saved (Colossians 1: 13), and as a sign that you are obedient to God and have died, been buried and raised with Christ, you must be baptized and dunked in lots of water, and to ratify your salvation, you must speak in tongues.” No wonder Jesus once warned, “A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.” (Matthew 16:4).
Thank you for your patience Tom. Regarding what you have said so far I will ask a few more questions if you don’t mind.
1) What do you think my experience as a child was?
2) Is it possible for a child to genuinely believe and have faith? 2b) Why was I shaken in my belief after that time?
3) What is it that Paul refers to in 1 Corinthians 1:13-15 ?
4) I was not baptized by charismatics, I did not and have not spoken in tongues in the way Biblically described. ( I have some glossolalia as a result of autism, but it is not as a signification of the work of the Holy Spirit – it is a condition of my infirm flesh – and I never did it publicly and rather bite my tongue often so as to not give a wrong impression. It is not the language of angels or the language of men: Those who spoke at Pentecost spoke clearly and in languages known to the gathered peoples. )
5) Is it possible to be deluded into thinking you have faith when you don’t have faith? ( Please answer this one especially with Scripture. )
6) I believe in the finished work of Christ on the cross, and do so contrary to any personal gain, but I still struggle with sin. Where have I gone wrong?
7) As a corollary to 5, what do I do if I don’t actually have faith, the Holy Spirit, or love ( αγαπη )? How must I approach God? Is it wrong to ask him again and again for greater faith and to be untroubled by doubts? Is it possible for Satan to deceive someone about the state of their salvation? If I am so deceived believing myself to be what I am not how do I become what I want to be? That is: A Son of God, adopted into the brotherhood established by God ( Romans 8:29 ) whereby Jesus – whose came in the flesh, fulfilled the Law, and bled out entirely ( at least that is my understanding of the blood and water per John 19:31-33 ) as a sacrifice for sin ( take your pick, there’s dozens of verses that say that ) – is the first of many brethren. To whom correspond the many promises of God. Them that will praise God eternally, live with him and he with them, be free of sin and death, their tears wiped away, and so on according to the many promises snd prophecies – some clear and some as-yet unclear, at least to me. I have earnest reason to hope for the resurrection because I have an illness that seems to be that it will worsen until I go into an untimely grave if God doesn’t heal me. And I ultimately know there’s no enduring hope elsewise as I have not fulfilled the law, nor have I any secret knowledge, and so if there is not this promise or if I have no part in it then I perish one way or another. I have many, many other questions, but this is already a lot. Regarding “secret knowledge”, one of the things I like best about the God of Israel is his promises that all will be revealed one day. Cos I’m very weary of the occult and of conspiracies and of hypocrites. ( And I’m scared to be one… It worries me to think that I am running in vain. Although my run is more of a sluggish shamble. ) Thank you again for your patience.
Colin
You have answered most of your questions, if not all, yourself in your assertion, “I believe in the finished work of Christ on the cross, . . ..” His cry “It is finished” (Tetelestai) as you know, means “paid in full” which in turn means that He has paid the ransom for all your sins, past, present and future. I notice that you use the singular “sin” and not the plural “sins” when you say “but I still struggle with sin. Where have I gone wrong?” We all struggle with sin (our old Adamic nature). It is a struggle until our dying day. We will only be free of this struggle when we receive our new bodies like unto that of Jesus at the resurrection. This is what Hebrews 7: 25 proclaims shall take place at the resurrection, “Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.” I have already discussed with you in detail what the baptism of the Holy Ghost means from Romans 6 in my previous comment on baptism. We are exhorted to reckon that we have died with Christ (died to sin – our old Adamic nature) and have received the new resurrected life in Christ by being raised with Him. This truth can only be appropriated by faith alone in the finished work of Christ on the cross and the fact that He ever lives to intercede for you, and not for you alone but all true believers in Him. Therefore, the question “Where have I gone wrong” is no longer relevant because He has righted our wrongs forever by accrediting to us his right-eousness. When God the Father looks at you He sees you in his Son being made righteous, so utterly righteous that it seems as though you have never sinned. Please do not misunderstand me. Yes, we sin, but I am trying to portray to you how God Himself sees you in his Son.
This brings me to your question, “How must I approach God?” Once again, you have answered your own question in your understanding of the blood of Christ. Listen to this magnanimous truth, “Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; And having an high priest over the house of God; Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.” (Hebrew 10:19-22). How must you approach God? – With boldness and full assurance of faith in all his promises. (2 Corinthians 1:20). He did not only wash away your sins with his blood; He has also washed you from an evil conscience. This simply means that neither, you, someone else nor Satan and his host can maltreat your conscience, by, for instance saying to you, “You say you are saved. Look what you have done in the past. You ask, ‘Where have I gone wrong?’ I will tell you where you have gone wrong. Do you remember such and such a day when you did so and so?” No, no, God says when you have asked for forgiveness, he casts all your sins behind his back (Isaiah 38: 17). Does He say “some sins?” No, He says all your sins. He does not only cast our sins behind his back, He also remembers them no more (Isaiah 43:25). No one, not even Satan and his hordes, can accuse you of anything because God says to them, “What did you say? I cannot remember a thing you are accusing my saints of. Not a single thing. Go away.”
Collin, don’t you think it is about time for you to turn your eyes away from yourself and stop looking inwardly to yourself and rather cast them on Jesus Christ who has done all these wonderful things for you? Trust me, looking inwardly to yourself all day long will only cause you to sink deeper and deeper into despondency and despair. Look unto Jesus, the Author and Finisher of your faith, and He will see you through. Why? Because in Him you are a new creation and all the old things have passed away (2 Corinthians 5: 17).
I am not too sure why you asked me “What do you think my experience as a child was?” Do you have any doubts? If you have any doubts, it is best to go to the Lord Jesus and ask Him why you are in doubt. The maxim “When in doubt, DON’T” is very appropriate, especially in spiritual matters.
Thank you, Tom.
It lifts my spirit to be reminded of these things. And some I have been shown only just now for the first time. The only thing that still troubles me are verses when Christ is declaring something like that unless they [ the Laodiceans] repent he will spew them out. And again the parable of the new wineskins. And again the matter that to love the world is to be at enmity with God. And again that unless a man “hate father, mother, brother, and sister and even his own life he can’t be his disciples.” There are still beautiful things that I enjoy in this world and sometimes I am sad to see them go, knowing they must burn in the End of Days. And I find it hard to hate my family. And a big struggle I have had is with a work of fiction I have been writing. I find it hard to give it up. I find it hard to give up music and art as well. But I do not want enmity with God, nor to insult him with the works of my hands. Especially seeing as these works are not good. How would you advise?
Tom Lessing skryf :
Dit is presies wat ek ervaar sodra ek mee gevoer word deur verskeie ‘self-help’ ministries, deliverance ministries , vroue-bedieninge, kom ervaar God -bedieninge, ens ens ens…. Ek het altyd gevoel die fokus bly terugkom na ‘my’ of ‘ons’ maarDie Woord bly agter. Ek kan getuig dat om God se Woord te lees die Waarheid bring en Vrymaak
The Truth Will Set You Free
Joh 8:31 En Jesus sê vir die Jode wat in Hom geglo het: As julle in my woord bly, is julle waarlik my dissipels.
Joh 8:32 En julle sal die waarheid ken, en die waarheid sal julle vrymaak.
Joh 8:55 En julle ken Hom nie, maar Ek ken Hom; en as Ek sê dat Ek Hom nie ken nie, sal Ek soos julle ‘n leuenaar wees. Maar Ek ken Hom en bewaar sy woord
Ek is moeg vir ander ‘predikers’ se interpretasie van ‘christenskap’.
Joh 14:26 maar die Trooster, die Heilige Gees, wat die Vader in my Naam sal stuur, Hy sal julle alles leer en sal julle herinner aan alles wat Ek vir julle gesê het